External Public Page

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 15 Next »

Overall Data Quality Score

Part 1


We don't have a way to export this macro.
(
  (
    (Source vs. Donor or MIS (%variation)
    + Source vs. Summary (%variation)
    + Summary Report vs. Donor or MIS (%variation)) / 3
  ) +

+ (% of available source documents)

+ (% of completed source documents)

+ (Confidentiality: Client data is protected * 100)

+ (Integrity: Are there unauthorised changes? * 100)

+ (Precision: Data has sufficient detail * 100)

+ (% of reports received on time)
) / 7

Part 2

(
  (
    (d2:zing(1.9 Staff explain data use correctly)
    + d2:zing(1.8 Documented feedback to site of reports)
    + d2:zing(1.5 Documented review of site level reports)
    + d2:zing(1.11 Documented quality controls in place)
    + d2:zing(1.12 Adequate and sufficient filing system)
    + d2:zing(2.3 Passwords in place)
    + d2:zing(2.2 Digital 1st data entry quality control)
    + d2:zing(2.4 Systems back ups in place)
    + d2:zing(1.4 Tool guidance available)
    + d2:zing(2.1 Paper to digital entry quality control)
    + d2:zing(1.10 Documented data handling guidance)
    + d2:zing(1.6 Staff explains data checks correctly)
    + d2:zing(1.1 Staff explained indicator correctly)
    + d2:zing(1.2 Standard reporting tools for services)
    + d2:zing(2.5 Documented stock management guidance)
    + d2:zing(1.3 Standard reporting tools for stock)
    + d2:zing(1.7 Documented reporting guidelines)
    )
    /
    d2:zpvc(
      1.9 Staff explain data use correctly,
      1.8 Documented feedback to site of reports,
      1.5 Documented review of site level reports,
      1.11 Documented quality controls in place,
      1.12 Adequate and sufficient filing system,
      2.3 Passwords in place,
      2.2 Digital 1st data entry quality control,
      2.4 Systems back ups in place,
      1.4 Tool guidance available,
      2.1 Paper to digital entry quality control,
      1.10 Documented data handling guidance,
      1.6 Staff explains data checks correctly,
      1.1 Staff explained indicator correctly,
      1.2 Standard reporting tools for services,
      2.5 Documented stock management guidance,
      1.3 Standard reporting tools for stock,
      1.7 Documented reporting guidelines
    )
  ) * 100
)

Result:

Overall Data Quality Score = (Part 1 + Part 2) / (1 + RDQA - M&E Assessment)


System Assessment Score

Part 1:

d2:zing(1.9 Staff explain data use correctly)
+ d2:zing(1.8 Documented feedback to site of reports)
+ d2:zing(1.5 Documented review of site level reports)
+ d2:zing(1.11 Documented quality controls in place)
+ d2:zing(1.12 Adequate and sufficient filing system)
+ d2:zing(2.3 Passwords in place)
+ d2:zing(2.2 Digital 1st data entry quality control)
+ d2:zing(2.4 Systems back ups in place)
+ d2:zing(1.4 Tool guidance available)
+ d2:zing(2.1 Paper to digital entry quality control)
+ d2:zing(1.10 Documented data handling guidance)
+ d2:zing(1.6 Staff explains data checks correctly)
+ d2:zing(1.1 Staff explained indicator correctly)
+ d2:zing(1.2 Standard reporting tools for services)
+ d2:zing(2.5 Documented stock management guidance)
+ d2:zing(1.3 Standard reporting tools for stock)
+ d2:zing(1.7 Documented reporting guidelines)

Part 2:

d2:zpvc(
    1.9 Staff explain data use correctly,
    1.8 Documented feedback to site of reports,
    1.5 Documented review of site level reports,
    1.11 Documented quality controls in place,
    1.12 Adequate and sufficient filing system,
    2.3 Passwords in place,
    2.2 Digital 1st data entry quality control,
    2.4 Systems back ups in place,
    1.4 Tool guidance available,
    2.1 Paper to digital entry quality control,
    1.10 Documented data handling guidance,
    1.6 Staff explains data checks correctly,
    1.1 Staff explained indicator correctly,
    1.2 Standard reporting tools for services,
    2.5 Documented stock management guidance,
    1.3 Standard reporting tools for stock,
    1.7 Documented reporting guidelines
)

Final Result:

System Assessment Score  = 
(
  (
    Part 1 / Part 2
  ) * 100


Overall Data Verification Score

Overall Data Verification Score  =
(
  (
    (
      Source vs. Donor or MIS (%variation)
      + Source vs. Summary (%variation)
      + Summary Report vs. Donor or MIS (%variation)
    ) / 3
    + % of available source documents
    + % of completed source documents
    + Confidentiality: Client data is protected * 100
    + Integrity: Are there unauthorised changes? * 100
    + Precision: Data has sufficient detail * 100
    + % of reports received on time
  ) / 7
)


Availability

% of available source documents

Completeness

% of completed source documents

Timeliness

% of reports received on time

Integrity

Integrity: Are there unauthorised changes? * 100

Confidentiality

Confidentiality: Client data is protected * 100

Precision

Precision: Data has sufficient detail * 100

Accuracy

(Source vs. Summary (%variation)
+ Source vs. Donor or MIS (%variation)
+ Summary Report vs. Donor or MIS (%variation)) / Value count

Source vs. Summary

Source vs. Summary (%variation)

Source vs. MIS or donor

Source vs. Donor or MIS (%variation)

Summary vs. MIS or donor

Summary Report vs. Donor or MIS (%variation)

Number of Assessments conducted

Enrollment count
  • No labels