Versions Compared

Old Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Shrab Sahota (Unlicensed)

Saved on

compared with

New Version 6

changes.mady.by.user Shrab Sahota (Unlicensed)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Sub-National (OU)

    • Facility (OU)

      • Provider (OU) --> Program OU assignment

        • Assessment Cycle (TEI): Start/ End, Scoring data

          • Feedback (Managed events - future)

          • Actions (Repeatable event)

Tip

Main advantages

  • UX: each TEI is a single assessment, with the related required set of actions and feedback.

  • Compatible with UiO’s future managed events design to address the feedback functionality - each failed question creates one managed event, which results in multiple entries.

  • Allows assignment of specific checklists to each provider (as they are OUs)

  • Analytics: fully fledge, at the provider level

Warning

Disadvantages

  • It requires the provider to be set as an org unit before the assessment can be conducted.

Option 2: Facility as the OU / Provider as TEA

...

  • Sub-National (OU)

    • Facility (OU)  --> Program OU assignment

      • Assessment Cycle (TEI): Start/ End, Scoring data.
        TEA: PROVIDER

        • Assessment (single events)

        • Feedback (Managed events - future. Could be 100s)

        • Actions (Repeatable event - 1 to 5 per assessment

Tip

Main advantages

  • It is rare to have a full list of providers available in advance to set up as OUs. Using TEA allows the recording of the provider’s name at the time of the assessment.

Warning

Disadvantages

  • Analytics can only be generated by the facility, NOT by the provider (provider shows only line-listing analytics)

  • Feedback sharing is at the Org Unit level, not at the provider level.

Option 3: Facility as the OU / Provider as TEI

...

  • Sub-National (OU)

    • Facility (OU) --> Program OU assignment

      • Provider (TEI)

        • Assessment (Repeatable event, one per assessment)

        • Feedback (Managed events - future. Could be 100s)

        • Actions (Repeatable event - 1 to 5 per assessment

Tip

Main advantages

  • It is rare to have a full list of providers available in advance to set up as OU's. Using TEI to enrol a provider during the visit is more realistic for on-the-ground implementation.

Warning

Disadvantages:

  • Mixes assessment/ actions and feedback events (managed events for feedback)

  • Current fork feedback will not work

  • Future feedback (managed events) will be a long list, and difficult to visualise.

  • Not compatible with PSI’s PCA.

Option 4: Provider as TEI, Assessment as Enrolment

Discarded Deprecated - analytics is not possible: we cannot use enrolments as DHIS2 doesn’t yet with the current version (2.38) which does not have enrolment analytics.